Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2007)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:57:27 -0500
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Bob Olhsson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: LP pressing question
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

-----Original Message----- From Steven C. Barr: "...Anyway, it was pretty well after WWII that the "record industry" evolved from a handful of big "record companies" that maintained their own recording studios, mastering facilities and pressing operations..." Electrical recordings were covered by numerous patents held by RCA and A.T.&T. prior to the late '40s that required one to lease the recording equipment and pay royalties on every copy sold. Indi labels only appeared after the emergence of magnetic recording and the end of the need to pay royalties to the patent holders. The majors responded by making their facilities available to indi labels. Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined! 615.385.8051 http://www.hyperback.com


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager