Date:         Wed, 17 May 2006 08:11:10 -0400
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Marcos Sueiro <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: IBM Claims 6.67 billion bits per square inch for data tape
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
          <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline

Fascinating --thanks for the posting!

--On Tuesday, May 16, 2006 5:29 PM -0400 "Richard L. Hess" 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> High density data tape still the "champ" according to this article:
>
> http://www.eet.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=187203437
>
> Richard L. Hess                   email: [log in to unmask]
> Aurora, Ontario, Canada       (905) 713 6733     1-877-TAPE-FIX
> Detailed contact information: http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
> Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard L. Hess                   email: [log in to unmask]
> Aurora, Ontario, Canada       (905) 713 6733     1-877-TAPE-FIX
> Detailed contact information: http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
> Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.



Marcos
http://tinyurl.com/kqdbk