Date:Tue, 4 Jul 2006 22:39:36 -0400
Reply-To:Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
<[log in to unmask]>
From:David Lennick <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: More than stereo--was: VHS and Beta (was Re: [ARSCLIST]
Longevity)
Comments:To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:text/plain; charset=us-ascii
phillip holmes wrote:
> You can say the same about listening environments as recording. There's a
> "just right" with a listening room. I've heard just as many that were too
> dead as too live. I wish I had studied acoustics in college. It seems that
> diffusion is the key to good sound. Kind of like that beautiful sound in an
> old growth forest where the sound echoes off the trees.
Can't resist asking..if there's nobody there to hear it, do the sounds just go
"Ah nuts, nobody's listening?"
> And there's
> something spooky about those places too. Must be the "there's a Barr, I
> mean a bear, in there somewhere" part of our brains being on guard.
> Phillip
You were right the first time.
dl (who, it must be admitted, hasn't been in Barr's current abode but fondly
remembers an earlier one with floor-to-ceiling records)
>
>
> > The odd thing is that no one ever seemed to discover that a much more
> > realitic-sounding recording could have been made if they had only used
> > acoustically "live" spaces instead of relentlessly eliminating any
> > trace of echo/reverberation! Listen to Waring's "Freshie"...which was
> > cut in an acoustically live setting (probably much to Victor's dismay!)
> > and as a result sounds very much like stereo. Our brains expect echoes
> > and are set up to extract a lot of information therefrom...in all
> > probability, our ancestors who could figure out which tree the bear
> > was hiding behind survived to evolve, while those that couldn't didn't...
> >
> > Steven C. Barr
> >
> >