Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2006)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:48:42 -0400
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Not using headphones
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
              reply-type=original

Back when musicians were, well, musicians instead of posers and "idols", good playing was all that was necessary to "punch through." And just to make clear -- I do not think good musicianship died with the dawn of rock, not at all. But I think much modern music relies on musically-retarded devices like click tracks (no need to have any inherent rhythm), loops (no need to be able to play anything right more than once), pitch correction (no need to have any idea of key or tone) and walls of noise (best to hide a terrible tone, uninspired riffs or horrid "singing"). Then apply modern awful recording techniques and "super-loud" distorted/clipped mastering and the result is basically ear-sewage. See the interview with Oscar Peterson in today's Wall Street Journal for more. Oscar makes a bunch of good points about why jazz is dead among young players. -- Tom Fine ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Brock-Nannestad" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:13 AM Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Not using headphones From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad ----- just to put modern recording in perspective, let me quote bits from a fresh review of some fine Danish microphones: by Rich Tozzolo, Pro Sound News, August 2006 DPA 4090/91 instrument microphones 'Some brands carry with them a certain essence of quality. DPA is one of those, with a loyal legion of worldwide users who rely on their mics to deliver detailed reproductions of acoustic events. When the company recently announced the release of a new line of omnis for under $1,000 ($599 each), I just had to check them out.' 'The day they arrived I recorded guitarist/songwriter, Scott Moore, who played Lowden 010C, Lowden L27FC and Collings OM1SS acoustics. These are fine instruments, and I placed one 4090 on the soundhole/fretboard and another out by the body. The cable was all Monster, and the preamp was a PreSonus ADL-600 straight to Pro Tools at 24-bit/48 kHz. Upon playback of the first pass, I found the mics delivered the open, clear tones of the guitar-exactly what I expected from a DPA. The term "very natural" comes to mind here, with a bit of the expected room sound omnis provide.' Further on, describing a slightly different setup, the following shows more modern practices: 'Although I normally would not place a high-quality omni on a wickedly loud guitar cabinet, it worked out great because the added top end meant less overall EQ was needed to punch the sound through' ----- so as not to be accused of quoting out of context, you may read the whole review (but nothing else) by going to: http://www.dpamicrophones.com/Images/DM03266.pdf (appr. 240kB) ----- for some reason the above makes me weep - thank God Django Reinhardt died before they had to punch his sound through! Kind regards, George


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager