Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2006)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:20:22 -0400
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         steven c <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Early stereo LPs: subject to mononuclearosis?
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

----- Original Message ----- From: <[log in to unmask]> > I wonder if this warning was aimed specifically at the then common and > popular General Electric Variable Reluctance cartridges. Their unique design had > zero vertical compliance. This still makes them an excellent choice for playing > 78s if you don't mind the wear from ten gram tracking force. Most other > cartridges designed for LP had at least some flexibility in that direction. > Well, considering that 78's up until c.1940 were played (and designed to be played) on either acoustic or early-electric (horseshoe magnet) machines, 10 grams should have produced minimal wear (at least on the records...) Steven C. Barr


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager