Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2006)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:05:23 -0400
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Marcos Sueiro Bal <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Can 78s sound better than LPs?
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I have noticed that when recommending sound cards for podcasting 78s, some on the list have not chosen top-of-the-line models with the assumption that the sound quality of 78s is inherently inferior to that, of, say, LPs. That seems generally to be the case, but I do remember once hearing a pristine 78 RPM acetate of a live jazz recording that blew me away --the sound was big and detailed, clean, and also quite louder than the average LP. My question is: is the 78 "system" inherently an inferior product? I do not know enough about it, but it seems to me that it is moving faster and the grooves are wider, so, potentially at least, it could sound better than 33s (stereo notwithstanding). Or could it? Marcos


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager