Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2005)Back to main ARSCLIST pageJoin or leave ARSCLISTReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:42:15 -0700
Reply-To:     Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         steven austin <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: [MLA-L] Requesting feedback on laser turntables
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Rebounding off Jeff's post...is anyone using it to write to digital, then go back and edit down/out the waveforms of the defects? I was wondering what (if any) advantage an ELP might offer when attempting a re-master from one-of-a-kind vinyl/shellac/acetate pressings? Steven Austin -----Original Message----- From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Kane Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:58 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] [MLA-L] Requesting feedback on laser turntables I own the LT-2XRC. I see no advantage whatsoever to the ELP but quite a few disadvantages given the situation as outlined. The turntable is hypersensitive to contamination. Any dirt/dust/etc will cause a torrent of audible pops and clicks where such distortion will be subaudible and/or not as severe with a standard turntable. Thus, a mandatory investment would be a Keith Monks or Loricraft record cleaner. Even they won't always get things clean enough for the ELP and you'll still have annoying transients. The subjective sound quality of the ELP is excellent. Yet, the conversion to a streaming digital medium will likely negate any advantage. Note that the ELP is fully analog and will still require A/D conversion. As to the price, the ELP units can be had for far less than retail. I purchased my unit as a 'refurb' for just under $8500 with shipping. I believe that in the case of sales to institutions, etc, that ELP prices at full 'retail'. When dealing with the private sector and individuals, they discount quite heavily. My experience was prior to their change in US 'distributors', so the strategy may have changed. I have not had reason to contact ELP for support. As I understand it, any repairs require shipping the unit back to Japan. Should ELP fail, the turntable will be a very expensive orphan. In my case, the ELP gets very little use. I find it invaluable when working with cracked LPs and 78s as it still plays through defects that would snap a standard stylus straight off. It also has some utility in compensating for groove wear as it can 'track' different points on the groove wall. It will not work with colored vinyl/shellac (although it DOES work with dark translucent vinyl such as Quiex II and JVC Supervinyl). In short, it's a limited purpose tool that does a few things quite well. It's a nice complement to a turntable, not a replacement for one.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ARSCLIST page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager