Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date
Produc-
tion well identifierOpen interval tested (feet)
Test type
Moni-
toring wellPumping rate (gallons per minute)
Length of test (hours)
Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day)Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less)Leakance (1/day)
Method of analysis
Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)
Back-
ground measure-
mentsProblems and comments
Broward County
Deerfield Beach West WTP
NR
ASR-1
956-1,1301
S
--
950-2,100
NR
--
-
--
--
42.6-32.0
NR
Step-drawdown test was performed prior to multiwell, but date of test was not given in report
12/10/92
ASR-1
956-1,1301
M
MW-1
1,200
5.7
24,200
1.33x10-6
6.3x10-2
H-J
--
Broward County WTP 2A
11/21/96
ASR-1
995-1,2001
S
--
1,050-2,950
8
-
--
--
--
90.6-51.1
Data collected for multiwell test but no information on whether corrections were made
Walton method should give same transmissivity if no leakance as C-J method(?) Curve matches look okay
11/26/96
ASR-1
995-1,2001
M
MW-1
1,000
24
28,900
1.1x10-4
None
Walton
--
11/26/96
ASR-1
995-1,2001
M
MW-1
1,000
24
37,200
5.3x10-5
--
C-J
--
11/26/96
ASR-1
995-1,2001
M
ASR-1
1,000
24
44,000
--
--
Theis Rec
NR
9/19/96
MW-1
990-1,2001
S
--
480
6
--
--
--
--
20
Sprintree WTP
6/6/97
ASR-1
1,110-1,2701
S
--
700-1,900
8
--
--
--
--
18.4-16.5
NR
Acidization of well done after step test and before constant rate test. Interpretation of recovery data favored late time data
7/28/97
ASR-1
1,110-1,2701
R
--
2,115
48
5,700
--
--
Theis Rec
22.75
Fiveash WTP
1/12/98
FMW-1
998-1,028
P, R
--
160
4
4,700
--
--
Theis Rec
4.7
NR
Third packer test showed apparent failure after about 10 minutes, which may have affected data. FMW-1 apparently not used in 24-hour test of ASR-1
1/13/98
FMW-1
998-1,042
P, R
--
160
4
8,000
--
--
Theis Rec
5
1/15/98
FMW-1
1,058-1,1751
P
--
600
10 min
23,500
--
--
C-J
46
3/16/98
FMW-1
1,055-1,1751
S
--
100-160
4
--
--
--
--
3.8-3.6
3/17/98
FMW-1
1,055-1,1751
S
--
164
24
NR
--
--
--
~3.5
3/25/98
ASR-1
1,055-1,2001
S
--
968-2,104
4
--
--
--
--
25.5-17.7
3/30/98
ASR-1
1,055-1,2001
R
--
2,100
24
19,500
--
--
Theis Rec
~17.5
Charlotte County
Shell Creek WtP
11/5/97
ASR-1
700-755
P
--
300-550
NR
--
--
--
--
10.0-5.6
NR
11/17/97
ASR-1
700-764
S
--
231-597
12
--
--
--
--
5.3-4.6
11/18/97
ASR-1
700-764
R
--
546
54
1,300
--
--
SC
4.4
6/28/99
ASR-1
764-9331
S
--
610-600
8
--
--
--
--
10.6
Englewood South Regional WWTP
NR
TPW-1
563-583
P, R
--
10
1.33
450
--
--
Theis Rec
1
NR
Multiwell aquifer test planned in the future
3/7/00
TPW-1
630-807
P
--
131
4
1,300
--
--
SC
5
3/31/00
TPW-1
507-7001
S
--
490-1,050
NR
4,700
--
--
SC
17.34 (avg)
4/20/00
SZMW-1
510-7001
S
--
31-101
NR
3,700
--
--
SC
13.87 (avg)
4/18/00
IMW-1
280-320
S
--
28.3-59.5
NR
2,300
--
--
SC
5.5-4.0
4/18/00
SMW-1
170-205
S
--
9.3-17.7
NR
300
--
--
SC
1 (avg)
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date
Produc-
tion well identifierOpen interval tested (feet)
Test type
Moni-
toring wellPumping rate (gallons per minute)
Length of test (hours)
Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day)Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less)Leakance (1/day)
Method of analysis
Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)
Back-
ground measure-
mentsProblems and comments
Collier County
Manatee Road
11-90
MW-A
360-460
P, S
--
NR
NR
2,400
--
--
See comment
NR
NR
All of the step-drawdown tests are indicated to be packer tests; however, some could have been a test of an open interval below casing. For step test, transmissivity was determined at each step by an unspecified method in Walton (1970). Then an adjusted e
11-90
MW-A
465-5301
P, S
--
NR
NR
20,000
--
--
See comment
NR
11-90
MW-A
680-760
P, S
--
NR
NR
15,000
--
--
See comment
NR
11-90
MW-A
930-1020
P, S
--
NR
NR
6,700
--
--
See comment
NR
11-90
MW-A
1,180-1,220
P, S
--
NR
NR
6,300
--
--
See comment
NR
11-90
MW-A
1,345-1,606
P, S
--
NR
NR
5,700
--
--
See comment
NR
NR
ASR-1
465-5281
M
MW-B
670
17
9,400
1.00x10-4
3.7x10-4
H-J
--
NR
ASR-1
465-528
M
MW-B
670
17
12,000
--
--
Theis Rec
--
Marco Lakes
NR
DZMW
296-399
S
--
220-600
NR
67,000
--
--
Walton
220-170
NR
Estimated transmissivity in lower Hawthorn zone I (550 to 622 feet) was too low for consideration as an aquifer storage and recovery interval. No dates were reported for any tests. Good agreement between tests
NR
DZMW
296-399
R
--
600
3
42,400
--
--
Theis Rec
NR
NR
DZMW
550-622
P, R
--
5
4
47
--
--
Theis Rec
NR
NR
DZMW
745-8111
R
--
187
4.5
8,200
--
--
Theis Rec
NR
NR
ASR-1
745-7901
M
ASR-1
463
8.3
16,300
--
--
Theis Rec
NR
NR
ASR-1
745-7901
M
DZMW
463
8.3
9,100
6.5x10-5
7x10-4
H-J
--
NR
ASR-1
745-7901
M
DZMW
463
8.3
12,000
--
--
Theis Rec
--
NR
ASR-2
736-7801
S
ASR-1
400-650
NR
--
--
--
--
25-24
NR
ASR-3
736-7801
S, M
ASR-2, ASRZMW
400-820
NR
8,000 to 8,100
--
--
C-J
17.4-15
Lee County
Lee County WTP
NR
ASR-1
445-6001
M
NR
350
48
800
1.00x10-4
1.0x10-2
H-J
NR
NR
Storage zone in ASR-1 is located in the lower Hawthorn producing zone of the Upper Floridan aquifer as defined by Reese (2000)
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date
Produc-
tion well identifierOpen interval tested (feet)
Test type
Moni-
toring wellPumping rate (gallons per minute)
Length of test (hours)
Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day)Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less)Leakance (1/day)
Method of analysis
Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)
Back-
ground measure-
mentsProblems and comments
Lee County--Continued
Corkscrew WTP
08-94
MW-A
428-515
P
--
NR
NR
500
--
--
SC
2.5
Data collected for multiwell test in September 1995
Test of MW-A, interval 744 to 778 feet, was of upper 34 of 240 feet thick Suwannee Limestone. Second multiwell test of ASR-1 followed back-plugging of MW-A to injection zone.Transmissivity values for step-drawdown test of ASR-2, 3, 4, and 5 were obtained b
8/17/94
MW-A
524-578
P
--
39
5 min.
500
--
--
SC
NR
8/24/94
MW-A
744-778
P, S
--
15-72
4
13,000
--
--
SC
1.3-0.6
NR
MW-B
452-504
NR
--
NR
NR
100
NR
NR
NR
NR
09-95
ASR-1
328-3971
M
MW-C
400
115.5
3,410
7.70x10-5
1.6x10-5
Hantush
--
09-95
ASR-1
328-3971
M
MW-C
400
115.5
3,380
6.70x10-5
--
C-J
--
09-95
ASR-1
328-3971
M
MW-C
400
115.5
3,460
--
--
Theis Rec
--
06-96
ASR-1
328-3971
M
MW-A
415
120
1,760
2.30x10-4
--
Theis
--
06-96
ASR-1
328-3971
M
MW-A
415
120
1,900
1.70x10-4
--
C-J
--
06-96
ASR-1
328-3971
M
MW-C
415
120
3,180
5.70x10-5
--
Theis
--
06-96
ASR-1
328-3971
M
MW-C
415
120
3,410
4.90x10-5
--
C-J
--
7/13/99
ASR-2
337-3971
S
--
115-410
NR
2,040
--
--
SC
7.8-6.6
2/12/99
ASR-3
285-3471
S
--
129-497
NR
7,350
--
--
SC
26.9-19.4
6/25/99
ASR-4
310-3681
S
--
153-450
NR
4,020
--
--
SC
15.0-11.7
7/8/99
ASR-5
253-2911
S
--
163-380
NR
-
--
--
-
7.4-5.2
7/20/99
ASR-5
253-2911
S
--
130-490
NR
13,400
--
--
SC
50.0-36.1
North Reservoir
12/7/98
MW-1
480-518
S
--
92-430
NR
14,400
--
--
SC
44.4-41.3
Data collected for 3 days prior to the multiwell test
Fit of line to ASR-1 recovery data for multiwell test is poor
12/9/98
MW-1
529-6191
P, S
--
73-295
NR
5,200
--
--
SC
9.7-3.5
12/11/98
MW-1
640-703
P, S
--
79-281
NR
2,040
--
--
SC
6.6-2.8
12/16/98
MW-1
808-890
P, S
--
55-190
NR
680
--
--
SC
2.8-1.8
12/18/98
MW-1
904-977
P, S
--
85-322
NR
9,590
--
--
SC
10.5-3.1
3/3/99
ASR-1
540-6421
S
--
162-590
4
2,220
--
--
SC
8.65-7.00
3/8/99
ASR-1
540-6421
M
MW-1
379
72
8,290
3.27x10-4
7.33x10-4
H-J
--
3/8/99
ASR-1
540-6421
M
MW-1
379
72
8,740
4.64x10-4
- -
C-J (recovery)
--
3/8/99
ASR-1
540-6421
M
ASR-1
379
72
8,570
--
- -
C-J (recovery)
NR
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date
Produc-
tion well identifierOpen interval tested (feet)
Test type
Moni-
toring wellPumping rate (gallons per minute)
Length of test (hours)
Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day)Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less)Leakance (1/day)
Method of analysis
Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)
Back-
ground measure-
mentsProblems and comments
Lee County--Continued
Winkler Avenue
NR
ASR-1
455-5541
S
--
135
15 min
--
--
--
--
59.7
Ninety hours collected prior to multiwell test, but apparently not used to correct drawdown data
Pumping rate for multiwell test was 1,540 for first 6.5 hours, then changed to 1,400. No attempt was made to analyze multiwell test data for storage coefficient or leakance. Storage zone is located in the lower Hawthorn producing zone of the Upper Florida
NR
ASR-1
455-647
S
--
160
15 min
--
--
--
--
86.3
6/16/99
ASR-1
455-5741
P
--
479
70 min
29,100
--
--
C-J (recovery)
NR
6/17/99
ASR-1
455-5751
P
--
483
18 min
26,600
--
--
C-J (recovery)
NR
10/23/99
ASR-1
455-5531
M
ASR-1
1540-1400
27
24,700
--
--
C-J
NR
10/23/99
ASR-1
455-5531
M
ASR-1
1540-1400
27
25,400
--
--
C-J (recovery)
--
10/23/99
ASR-1
455-5531
M
SZMW-1
1540-1400
27
27,400
NR
NR
C-J
--
10/23/99
ASR-1
455-5531
M
SZMW-1
1540-1400
27
29,000
--
--
C-J (recovery)
--
San Carlos Estates
6/7/99
TPW-1
650-7011
S
--
710-1,480
8
--
--
--
--
250-130
Unknown for multiwell test. Test followed 10 days of recharge at 1,955 gallons per minute and then 6-day static period.
High specific capacity in TPW-1 due to two pilot holes in open interval. Pumping rate for test on 11/10/99 of 985 gallons per minute was natural flow.
C-J solution for drawdown in SZMW-1R is suspect. Solution is for very late time only, and background changes due to prior recharge may have affected response
7/29/99
SZMW-1R
659-7211
S
--
170-350
8
--
--
--
--
15-9.0
8/2/99
SMW-1
234-321
S
--
150-220
8
--
--
--
--
8.9-6.5
11/10/99
TPW-1
650-7011
M
SZMW-1R
985
8
39,000
1.00x10-2
--
C-J
--
11/10/99
TPW-1
650-7011
M
SZMW-1R
985
8
70,000
--
--
Theis Rec
--
Olga WTP
1/5/99
MW-1
515-605
S
--
110-400
NR
2,500
--
--
SC
NR
Measured for multiwell test, but unknown if used to correct drawdown
H-J results for multiwell test agree better with single well and packer test than C-J results. A second constant rate test was run but is not reported here. Storage zone is about 150 feet below top of Suwannee Limestone
1/7/99
MW-1
612-689
P
--
70-200
NR
1,300
--
--
SC
NR
2/3/99
MW-1
835-9351
P
--
70-355
NR
7,600
--
--
SC
NR
2/4/99
MW-1
710-935
P
--
70-350
NR
7,600
--
--
SC
NR
2/4/99
MW-1
835-9351
P
--
70-350
NR
7,600
--
--
SC
NR
2/8/99
MW-1
945-1,101
P
--
6 to 15
NR
33
--
--
SC
NR
3/17/99
MW-3
740-820
S
--
78-480
NR
1,900
--
--
SC
NR
3/25/99
MW-3
830-9451
P
--
80-340
NR
9,000
--
--
SC
NR
3/25/99
MW-3
854-9451
P
--
75-350
NR
6,400
--
--
SC
NR
3/26/99
MW-3
857-9451
R
--
300
NR
8,700
--
--
Theis Rec
NR
11/1/99
ASR-1
859-9201
S
--
112-545
5
5,000
--
--
SC
14.9-8.5
11/3/99
ASR-1
859-9201
M
MW-1
500
60
7,200
5.10x10-5
5.2x10-3
H-J
--
11/3/99
ASR-1
859-9201
M
MW-1
500
60
12,000
4.10x10-5
--
C-J
--
11/3/99
ASR-1
859-9201
M
MW-3
500
60
9,400
5.50x10-5
6.0x10-2
H-J
--
11/3/99
ASR-1
859-9201
M
MW-3
500
60
11,000
4.20x10-4
--
C-J
--
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date
Produc-
tion well identifierOpen interval tested (feet)
Test type
Moni-
toring wellPumping rate (gallons per minute)
Length of test (hours)
Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day)Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less)Leakance (1/day)
Method of analysis
Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)
Back-
ground measure-
mentsProblems and comments
Miami-Dade County
Hialeah
2/10/75
MW-1
953-1,0601
M
ASR-1
250
1.66
11,000
8.4x10-5
--
J-L
--
NR
Transmissivity estimate from Meyer (1989b). Storage coefficient estimated by model simulation of pumping test
West Well Field
1/26/97
ASR-1
850-1,3021
S
--
1,400-4,000
8
--
--
--
--
269-52.1
Measured for multiwell test. Correction was not done, due to negligibility.
All three aquifer storage and recovery wells were heavily acidized prior to all tests. Late time drawdown data problematic because of pump going down several times.
2/25/97
ASR-2
845-1,2501
S
--
1,500-3,800
8
--
--
--
--
126.6-51.1
4/8/97
ASR-3
835-1,2101
S
--
1,500-3,800
8
--
--
--
--
46.1-38.2
12/9/97
ASR-1
850-1,3021
M
ASR-1
3,500
72
10,300
N/A
N/A
C-J
NR
12/9/97
ASR-1
850-1,3021
M
ASR-2
3,500
72
15,400
3.90x10-4
1.6x10-3
Walton
--
12/9/97
ASR-1
850-1,3021
M
ASR-2
3,500
72
18,200
2.90x10-4
N/A
C-J
--
12/9/97
ASR-1
850-1,3021
M
ASR-3
3,500
72
15,400
4.40x10-4
3.9x10-5
Walton
--
12/9/97
ASR-1
850-1,3021
M
ASR-3
3,500
72
19,700
3.30x10-4
N/A
C-J
--
Monroe County
Marathon
5/3/90
ASR-1
387-4321
M
OW-1
105
25
2,290
3.20x10-4
NR
Walton
--
Measured for 3 weeks prior to multiwell test. A regional increasing trend in water level was determined
Leakance using Walton (1962) method not determined
5/3/90
ASR-1
387-4321
M
OW-1
105
25
2,510
3.70x10-4
--
C-J
--
5/3/90
ASR-1
387-4321
M
OW-1
105
25
1,760
--
--
Theis-Rec
--
5/3/90
ASR-1
387-4321
M
OW-2
105
25
2,180
5.20x10-4
NR
Walton
--
5/3/90
ASR-1
387-4321
M
OW-2
105
25
4,090
--
--
Theis-Rec
--
5/6/90
ASR-1
387-4321
S
--
95-350
NR
--
--
--
--
3.9-2.7
Okeechobee County
Taylor Creek-Nubbin Slough (Lake Okeechobee)
4/20/98
MW-1
1,175-1,227
P
--
10
6.4
706
NR
--
C-J
NR
Water-level data taken for 5 days prior to constant rate test; corrections made using a long-term increasing trend
Leakance derived by extrapolation; longer pumping period required for more accurate value
4/20/98
MW-1
1,175-1,227
P, R
--
10
6.4
2,940
--
--
Recovery
NR
8/2/98
ASR-1
1,268-1,7101
M
ASR-1
6,500
24
620,000
N/A
N/A
C-J (recovery)
1,600
8/2/98
ASR-1
1,268-1,7101
M
MW-1
6,500
24
586,000
1.25x10-3
0.01-0.001
H-J
1,600
8/2/98
ASR-1
1,268-1,7101
M
MW-1
6,500
24
765,000
1.90x10-4
N/A
C-J (recovery)
1,600
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date
Produc-
tion well identifierOpen interval tested (feet)
Test type
Moni-
toring wellPumping rate (gallons per minute)
Length of test (hours)
Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day)Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less)Leakance (1/day)
Method of analysis
Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)
Back-
ground measure-
mentsProblems and comments
Palm Beach County
Boynton Beach East WTP
4/9/92
ASR-1
804-9001
S
--
320-2,100
NR
6,800-13,000
NR
--
C-J
18-28
NR
Second step test is with permanent equipment installed in well. Average of estimates for transmissivity was 70,000 gallons per day per foot
10/15/92
ASR-1
804-9091
S
--
798-1,723
NR
Not calculated
--
--
C-J
29-27
Delray Beach North Storage Reservoir
6/5/96
ASR-1
849-899
P
--
49
NR
--
--
--
--
0.37
NR
Second step test performed after acidization of well. For the second step test, pump malfunctioned after about 10 minutes of pumping during the last step at 2,550 gallons per minute
6/11/96
ASR-1
900-952
P
--
83
NR
--
--
--
--
0.9
6/14/96
ASR-1
974-1,020
P
--
90
NR
--
--
--
--
2.4
6/18/96
ASR-1
1,020-1,100
P
--
98
NR
--
--
--
--
2
9/20/96
ASR-1
1,020-1,2001
S
--
575-1,100
24
--
--
--
--
10.8-7.8
2/24/98
ASR-1
1,020-1,2001
S
--
760-2,550
13.2
--
--
--
--
17.2-15.7
West Palm Beach WTP
8/22/96
FAMW
975-1,091
P, S
--
64-142
NR
--
--
--
--
194-86
NR
Recovery was allowed following step test of ASR-1 before multiwell test was begun. Large deviation from Theis curve during late time, but leaky aquifer solution not used
9/14/96
FAMW
1,304-1,384
P, S
--
55-110
NR
--
--
--
--
220-110
8/29/96
FAMW
975-1,090
S
--
300-584
NR
--
--
--
--
75-58
9/1/96
FAMW
975-1,1901
S
--
300-584
NR
--
--
--
--
110-101
9/4/96
FAMW
975-1,290
S
--
550-740
NR
--
--
--
--
116-105
9/6/96
FAMW
975-1,384
S
--
550-740
NR
--
--
--
--
116-99
11/19/96
FAMW
975-1,1911
S
--
550-732
NR
--
--
--
--
62-42
1/30/97
ASR-1
985-1,2001
S
--
508-704
24
--
--
--
--
390-306
2/1/97
ASR-1
985-1,2001
M
FAMW
700
24
138,000
1.00x10-4
--
C-J
--
2/1/97
ASR-1
985-1,2001
M
FAMW
700
24
108,000
8.00x10-4
--
Theis
--
Western Hillsboro Canal, Site 1
4/5/00
EXW-1
1,160-1,225
P
--
95
NR
--
--
--
--
22.6
NR
Acidized EXW-1 with 4,300 gallons of 36 percent HCl on 6-2-00
4/10/00
EXW-1
1,015-1,150
P
--
105
NR
--
--
--
--
10.9
5/25/00
EXW-1
1,015-1,2251
S
--
1,000-3,000
NR
--
--
--
--
31.1-26.6
St. Lucie County
8/24/82
MW-1
600-7751
M
ASR-1
388
72
5,910
1.64x10-4
4.3x10-2
H-J (drawdown)
--
NR
Also conducted four pump tests of ASR-1 during drilling with total depth ranging from 627 to 1,000 feet and casing at 600 feet. Transmissivity was calculated from these tests based on recovery data from ASR-1
8/24/82
MW-1
600-7751
M
ASR-1
388
72
6,430
2.67x10-4
4.7x10-2
H-J (recovery)
--
1Open interval tested is the same (or about the same) as the storage zone.
| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/wri/02-4036/table3.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 14 January, 2005 @ 11:09 AM (KP)