Skip Navigation
small header image
The Condition of Education Indicator List Site Map Back to Home
Section Image Learner Outcomes
: Academic Outcomes
<<Previous Next>>
1.

Participation in Education

2.

Learner Outcomes

Introduction

Early Childhood Outcomes

Academic Outcomes

- Reading Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

Mathematics Performance of Students in Grades 4 and 8

Writing Performance of Students in Grades 8 and 12

Economics Performance of Students in Grade 12

Trends in the Achievement Gaps in Reading and Mathematics

International Comparison of 4th- and 8th-Grade Performance in Mathematics

Poverty and Student Mathematics Achievement

Reading and Mathematics Score Trends by Age

Reading and Mathematics Achievement at 5th Grade

Student Reading and Mathematics Performance in Public Schools by Urbanicity

International Comparisons of Reading Literacy in Grade 4

International Comparisons of Mathematics Literacy

International Comparisons of Mathematics Cognitive Domains of 4th- and 8th-Graders

International Comparisons of Science Literacy

Science Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

International Comparison of 4th- and 8th-Grade Performance in Science

U.S. History Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

Geography Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

Adult Literacy

Social and Cultural Outcomes

Economic Outcomes

3.

Student Effort and Educational Progress

4.

Contexts of Elementary and Secondary Education

5.

Contexts of Postsecondary Education



Bibliography

Reading Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

National average reading scores of 4th- and 8th-graders were higher in 2007 than in 1992, by 4 and 3 points, respectively. However, the reading score of 12th-graders was 6 points lower in 2005 than in 1992.

The percentage of 4th-graders performing at or above the Basic achievement level on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading assessment was higher in 2007 than in 1992 (67 vs. 62 percent), as was the percentage performing at or above the Proficient achievement level (33 vs. 29 percent).1 Percentages at both of these achievement levels were higher in 2007 than in 2005 (see table 12-1). The percentage of 8th-graders performing at or above Basic was higher in 2007 than in 1992 (74 vs. 69 percent), while there was no measurable difference in the percentage performing at or above Proficient. In 2007, the percentage of 8th-graders at or above Basic was higher than that in 2005, but the percentages at or above Proficient for these two years were not measurably different. The percentage of 12th-graders performing at or above Basic was lower in 20052 than in 1992 (73 vs. 80 percent), as was the percentage of 12th-graders performing at or above Proficient (35 vs. 40 percent).

Reported on a scale of 0 to 500, national average reading scores of 4th- and 8th-graders were higher in 2007 than in 1992, by 4 and 3 points, respectively (see table 12-2). These 2007 scores were higher than 2005 scores. The reading score of 12th-graders was 6 points lower in 2005 than in 1992. In the most recent assessment, females at each grade level outscored their male counterparts. For example, 12th-grade females scored 13 points higher than males in 2005. Average scores were higher in 2007 than in 1992 for White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander 4th-graders (ranging from 6 to 16 points) and for White, Black, and Hispanic 8th-graders (ranging from 5 to 7 points), while scores were lower in 2005 than in 1992 for White, Black, and Hispanic 12th-graders (ranging from 5 to 7 points).

NAEP results also permit state-level comparisons of the abilities of 4th- and 8th-graders in public schools.3 The percentage of 4th-grade students performing at or above Basic was higher in 2007 than in 1992 in 24 of the 42 states that participated in both assessment years (see table 12-3). Of the 38 states that participated in the grade 8 assessment in both years, the percentage of students performing at or above Basic was higher in 2007 than in 1998 in 5 states and lower in 2007 than in 1998 in 7 states.


1 Testing accommodations (e.g., extended time, small group testing) for children with disabilities and limited-English-proficient students were not permitted in 1992 and 1994, and students were tested with and without accommodations in 1998. (back to text)

2 The 2003 and 2007 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Reading Assessments were not administered to 12th-grade students. (back to text)

3 State samples were not collected for grade 12; therefore, state results for grade 12 are not available. (back to text)


PDF  

Download/view file containing indicator and corresponding tables. (263 KB)

white bar
Charts  

READING PERFORMANCE: Percentage distribution of 4th- and 8th-grade students across NAEP reading achievement levels: Selected years, 1992–2007

white bar
Tables  

Table 12-1: Average reading scale scores and percentage of students at each achievement level, by grade: Selected years, 1992–2007

Table 12-2: Average reading scale scores, by grade and selected student and school characteristics: 1992, 2005, and 2007

Table 12-3: Average reading scale scores and achievement-level results for public school 4th- and 8th-graders, by state: 1992, 1998, and 2007

white bar
Standard Error Tables  

Table S12-1: Standard errors for the average reading scale scores and percentage of students at each achievement level, by grade: Selected years, 1992–2007

Table S12-2: Standard errors for the average reading scale scores, by grade and selected student and school characteristics: 1992, 2005, and 2007

Table S12-3: Standard errors for the average reading scale scores and achievement-level results for public school 4th- and 8th-graders, by state: 1992, 1998, and 2007

white bar
Supplemental Notes  

Note 1: Commonly Used Variables

Note 4: National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

black bar


1990 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006, USA
Phone: (202) 502-7300 (map)