The Library of Congress

Collection Connections


The African-American Experience in Ohio: Selections from the Ohio Historical Society

U.S. HistoryCritical ThinkingArts & Humanities

In a hurry? Save or print these Collection Connections as a single file.

Go directly to the collection, The African-American Experience in Ohio: Selections from the Ohio Historical Society, in American Memory, or view a Summary of Resources related to the collection.

The African-American Experience in Ohio, 1850-1920, contains a number of primary sources reflecting the diversity and complexity of African-American culture from the eve of the Civil War through the early twentieth century.  The numerous manuscripts, hundreds of photographs, and thousands of newspaper articles contained in this collection touch on subjects relating to abolitionist tracts, efforts in the military and the Underground Railroad, Reconstruction policies, labor movements, and other matters that affected the daily lives of the African-American community.

1.  Abolitionists

This collection contains several items that reflect both the principles and practices of nineteenth-century abolitionists. The Ripley Anti Slavery Society in Ripley, Ohio was one of many organizations dedicated to "the entire abolition of Slavery in the United States." The Ripley Anti Slavery Society’s Constitution details the group’s plan "to convince their fellow citicens that slaveholding is a henious sin in the sight of God," (page 1).

Materials in this collection also reflect the resistance that abolitionists such as those of the Ripley Society faced in trying to get their point across. For example, a search on abolitionist results in pieces such as the February, 1844 Palladium Of Liberty article, "Abolitionist But," which challenges some of the reservations people had about the cause:

 

Ripley Society Constitution
Constitution of Ripley Anti Slavery Society,
from Ripley Anti Slavery Society Minute Book, Created 1848-1858.

I would be an abolitionist but I think I can do more for the people of color as I am . . . So it is with all their buts, they are opposed to slavery in any sense of the word; still they are not willing to act with a party that has for its object the abolition of slavery . . . Near sixty years has elapsed since the spirit of liberty has been promulgated among this people, still they are butting at the walls of slavery, and continue to but deceitfully until the two hundred and fifty thousand slave holders have managed to get the government into their own hands.
  • Who is the target audience of this article?
  • How does the piece attempt to support its case with statistics?
  • Is this piece persuasive?  Why?

In addition to trying to change citizens’ minds, abolitionists sought to influence legislatures. The State Convention of Colored Men meeting in Columbus, Ohio on January 16-18, 1856 resulted in a pamphlet that includes an address to the state legislature requesting that the word, "white," be struck from the state constitution in all references to suffrage:

We ask you to ponder the danger of circumscribing the great doctrines of human equality . . . to the narrow bounds of races or nations.  All men are by nature equal, and have inalienable rights, or none have.  We beg you to reflect how insecure your own and the liberties of your posterity would be by the admission of such a rule of construing the rights of men. . . .

Page 4 [Transcription]
Proceedings, Held in the City of Columbus, January 16-18, 1856

  • What are the implications of a state constitution that refers only to "white men"?
  • How does it treat notions of equal rights?
  • Does the convention make a convincing argument?
  • What points appeal to the emotions of members of the Ohio legislature? What points appeal to their reason?
  • How do the agendas of these two abolitionist groups, The Ripley Anti Slavery Society and The State Convention of Colored Men, differ?
  • Why did abolitionists appeal for African Americans' right to vote?
  • Is it more effective to appeal directly to the legislature that can make such an amendment or to the citizens who appoint the legislature?

2. African-American Soldiers in the Civil War

Pickets on Duty
Pickets on Duty
,
Virginia, 1861-1865.

  The Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 made it possible for African Americans to join the Union army. A search on Civil War Union soldier provides a number of examples of these soldiers' different roles during the conflict.  The presence of racial distinctions in the army is evident in Jacob Bruner’s April 28, 1863 letter to his wife when he adds "A.D." to his mailing address and explains, "A.D. Means African Descent." White officer Jacob Bruner had accepted a commission as First Lieutenant of the 9th Louisiana Volunteer Infantry, a newly formed regiment of black enlisted men. Bruner later describes the daily routine of his regiment and his feelings about joining the Union army:

We drill twice each day . . . They learn very fast and I have no doubt they will make as rapid progress as white soldiers.

As fast as we get them we clothe them from head to foot in precisely the same uniform that "our boys" wear, give them tents, rations, and Blankets and they are highly pleased and hardly know themselves . . . I am happy and think myself . . . fortunate in enjoying as much of the confidence of my country and the President as to be able to assist in this new as I believe successful experiment.

Page 3 [Transcription]
Jacob Bruner’s April 28, 1863 letter
  • What does Bruner consider as his role in the Union army?
  • Why is the confidence of the country, and particularly the President, important in his effort?
  • What are the potential benefits of the success of the "experiment" of using African-American soldiers?
A search on stereoview provides some images from the "War Views" section of a Civil War series entitled "Photographic History. The War for the Union" while a search on Men of Mark yields portraits of prominent nineteenth-century African Americans.  Although these illustrations aren’t limited to Civil War soldiers, Men of Mark includes a portrait of James Monroe Trotter (1842-1892), a democratic politician who joined the 55th Massachusetts Regiment and became one of the regiment's four African-American commissioned officers. It also includes a portrait of Martin Robison Delany (1812-1885), an editor, author, physician, abolitionist, black nationalist, and army officer who became the first African-American field officer of high rank when he was commissioned as a Major in 1865.  

Martin Robinson Delany
Portrait of Martin Robinson Delany, 1887.

  • How do these images portray African-American soldiers?
  • What do they imply about the success of this "experiment" of allowing African Americans in the army?
  • How do these images reinforce the role of African-American soldiers during the Civil War?
  • What do the civilian accomplishments of people such as Trotter and Delany imply about the success of the Emancipation Proclamation? How might their success as army officers have contributed to their other accomplishments?

3.  The Underground Railroad

Abolitionists working in the Underground Railroad guided fugitive slaves to freedom under the cover of darkness and subterfuge. Many slaves crossed the Ohio River from Kentucky into the free states of Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio, to escape from the bonds of slavery. A search on Underground Railroad provides a number of photographs of places along the railroad, and of people who worked for or benefited from it. A search on fugitive slave provides newspaper articles "Slaves Shot" and "Warning of Slave Catchers in Area" and a brief biography, Life, Including His Escape and Struggle for Liberty, of Charles A. Garlick . . . that includes Garlick's description of his escape from slavery.

Escape attempts such as Garlick's often resulted in fugitive slave hunts.  A search on runaway slave produces advertisements from owners announcing a reward for the apprehension and return of slaves such as Emily and Tom.

 

Broadside Announcing Reward for Emily
Broadside Announcing a Reward for the Return of a Runaway Slave, Emily,
August 4, 1853.

 

Addison White
Addison White.

 

Slave owners would occasionally free their slaves by voluntarily issuing manumission papers. A search on manumission features a few copies of such papers, including those of Sam Barnett and America Barnett from 1859. A search on fugitive slave photograph provides images of fugitive slaves such as Addison White, whose freedom was purchased in part by the city of Mechanicsburg, Ohio.

Additional information about this effort is available in William Still’s book, The Underground Railroad: A Record of Facts, Authentic Narratives, Letters . . . . from the African-American Odyssey collection.

  • What were the potential dangers for those using and conducting the Underground Railroad?
  • How did the Underground Railroad affect the relationship between the North and South at the time?
  • What does the language of reward notices for fugitive slaves indicate about the status of slaves and the relationship between slaves and their owners?
  • What do such notices suggest about what a fugitive slave might have had to do to avoid being apprehended?
  • Why would the owner of a fugitive slave offer different rewards depending on where the slave was caught?
  • What might you expect someone to have had to do to obtain such a reward?
  • Why would a slaveholder travel to Ohio to free his slaves, as did the owner of Sam and America Barnett?
  • How do these photographs depict the people associated with the Underground Railroad? Who do you think might have taken these pictures and why?
    Phebe Benedict
Phebe Benedict
,
Underground Railroad Station-Keeper, Alum Creek Friends' Settlement (Marengo), Morrow County, Ohio.

4.  Reconstruction Policies

During Reconstruction, the nation struggled with how to assimilate freed slaves into national and local communities while minimizing the resistance from citizens who were not willing to aid African Americans. A search on Reconstruction provides articles discussing various government policies of the era. For example, Charles Sumner’s 1864 Senate speech, "Bridge from Slavery to Freedom" called for the establishment of a Freedmen’s Bureau that would assist recently freed slaves in finding work.  In his address, Sumner claimed, "The curse of slavery is still upon them. Somebody must take them by the hand; not to support them but simply to help them to that work which will support them." One discussion of the efforts of the Freedmen’s Bureau is available in The Freedmen's Bureau reports on the condition of the agency in the Southern States from The African-American Pamphlet Collection, 1824-1909.

A decade after Sumner’s address, Howard University Professor J.M. Langston discussed the late senator's contributions to the Reconstruction efforts and described the benefits of recent amendments to the Constitution in his speech, "Equality Before the Law."

George Henderson also chronicled the development of federal law during Reconstruction in his January 1899 article, "History of Negro Citizenship."  Here, Henderson is critical of President Andrew Johnson’s efforts--especially when they are compared to those of Abraham Lincoln:

[W]hile President Johnson’s plan was in substantial agreement with his illustrious predecessor’s, the spirit with which it was executed made all the difference in the world . . . Mr. Lincoln hated slavery . . . because of its monstrous injustice and inhumanity. Mr. Johnson hated it mainly because he hated the slaveholders . . . He was not an abolitionist; in fact he probably had less sympathy with the abolition party than with the slaveholders.

Page 9 [Transcription]
History of Negro Citizenship

  • What is Henderson's argument against President Johnson? How does he illustrate his argument?
  • Did the alleged differences in presidential attitudes influence efforts during Reconstruction?

5.  Lynching

A 1919 news article quoted the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (N.A.A.C.P.) statistic that more than 3,000 people were lynched between 1889 and 1918.  Since the Reconstruction era, lynching was a common weapon against African Americans seeking to exercise some of the liberties provided by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.

A search on lynch offers numerous newspaper articles on lynching (including the lynching of a 15-year-old girl in 1892). Other articles discuss the efforts of the Anti-Lynching League and attempts to pass a federal anti-lynching law. S. Laing Williams’ article, "Frederick Douglass at Springfield, Mo." describes the late orator’s remarks on lynching at the close of Chicago’s 1893 Columbian Exposition:

[T]he address went straight to the conscience of the audience and disturbed those who would claim a sort of immunity from blame because of their distance from the scenes of lawlessness. How accurately did he prophecy that in a few years lynching in the Northern States would be almost as possible as in Arkansas or Mississippi.  How that baleful prophecy has been fulfilled, we can all bear sorrowful testimony.

Page 3 [Transcription]
Frederick Douglass at Springfield, Mo.

The criticism of the mentality that allowed for lynching in America appears in the political cartoons, "When Will He Admit This?" (1905) and "Against Race Prejudice" (1906) whose caption begins: "Say what you will, there will never be an adjustment of the race situation in America as long as lynchings and riots are tolerated and the door of opportunity remains closed."

    Cartoon - When Will He Admit This
Cartoon, "When Will He Admit This?"
    Cartoon - Against Race Prejudice
Cartoon, "Against Race Prejudice."
   
  • What does lynching achieve that other forms of violence do not?
  • What does a lynching imply about the person being lynched?
  • Should a response to mob violence such as lynchings be active or passive? Which is more effective? Why?
  • According to the political cartoons, why is ending racial prejudice essential to stopping a lynching?
  • Do the cartoons' messages have any value for contemporary American society?

6.  African Americans and the Republican Party

African Americans finally gained suffrage through the Fifteenth Amendment in 1869. Throughout the nineteenth century, the Aftrican-American vote went to the Republican Party. A search on Republican provides a number of examples of and explanations for this loyalty. In 1892, the African-American press in Ohio supported Republican candidates running for local, state, and national offices.  Editorials called on readers to remember that Republicans had championed a number of Reconstruction policies.  In his essay, "The Negro in the Present Campaign," Frederick Douglass argued against splitting the African-American vote between the two political parties:

In view of the great issues involved and of the dangers impending, it is sad to think that in this campaign any Negro may so act as to endanger the lives and liberties of his brothers in the South, and to also injure in the North the good name of his race. Such would certainly be the case should any support be given by him to the Democratic party--the party which has always endeavored to degrade his race-and should he refuse to support the Republican party--the party which has always endeavored to improve the conditions of his existence.

Page 2 [Transcription]
The Negro in the Present Campaign

This sentiment is also reflected in William Stewart’s chronicle of the Democratic Party's mistreatment of African Americans in his 1899 "Address to the Afro-Americans of Ohio," and in the Colored American Republican Text Book, which touted the achievements of Republican President William McKinley’s first term in office:

Colored men of intelligence and character have been selected from every section of the country to fill positions of trust and profit under the Administration . . . Indeed, while it is a fact of great significance that the President has within nineteen months appointed fully twice as many Negroes as any previous Administration, developments are now being so shaped by him . . . that the number of Negro officeholders will be increased fourfold.  Not only this, but the constitutional rights of the Negro will continue to be sacredly regarded and his future in the new possessions will be surrounded by every guarantee calculated.

Page 8 [Transcription]
Colored American Republican Text Book

The Colored American Republican Text Book also presents a visual argument in illustrations depicting the distinction between what it’s like for African Americans to vote in Republican and Democratic states. 

    Cartoon - Voting in Rpublican State
"How He Casts His Vote in a Republican State."
    Cartoon - Voting in Democratic State
"How the Colored Voter is Allowed to Cast his Ballot in a State Where Democrats Control the Election."
   

Similar themes appeared in political cartoons such as the 1904 Cleveland Journal’s "Real Chore," the 1908 Cleveland Journal’s, "Never Swap Horses While Crossing A Stream," and the 1916 Cleveland Advocate’s "This is the "Bread-Line" of Normal Democratic Times."

  • How do the preceding speeches and publications portray the two political parties? Are these characterizations accurate?
  • How do the Journal and Advocate's cartoons differ from the illustrations in the Colored American Republican Text Book? Are these cartoons and illustrations effective?
  • What is the value of conveying an argument visually?

7.  Labor Movements

Although slavery ended with the Emancipation Proclamation, a search on peonage yields some news articles about African Americans who remained in servitude against their will.  An article from the February 6, 1904 Cleveland Gazette describes six children who were enslaved for six years after their father was killed. Editorials that are critical of other forms of child labor appear in a 1905 Cleveland Journal piece and an essay in the January 1913 edition of the African Methodist Episcopal Church Review, which notes, "This agitation on behalf of the mill and factory children (all white) is bound to react in favor of the black children of the South."

  • According to the African Methodist Episcopal Church Review editorial, why would concern for white children lead to concern for black children? Upon what concepts of the nation and of childhood is this belief based?
  • What are the similarities and differences between slavery and child labor?
  • Is it surprising that child labor continued after the Emancipation Proclamation?
  • How might any of these authors have responded to the Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Company (1922) to invalidate the Federal Child Labor Law of 1916?

Concerns for child labor were just one facet of the late-nineteenth-century movement toward unionization. The Knights of Labor actively recruited African-American workers.  By 1886, approximately 60,000 African Americans had joined the union. A search on Knights of Labor provides some brief newspaper accounts of African-American participation in the union and employers’ concern that this participation would lead to increased expenses. 

  • Why did the Knights of Labor appeal directly to African-American workers?
  • How would this organization have benefited from such enrollment?
  • What are the benefits of joining a union?
  • How might African Americans' history of slavery and their experience during Reconstruction have affected their attitudes towards unionization? How might these attitudes have differed from those of white workers?

  home top of page  
The Library of Congress | American Memory Contact us
Last updated 09/26/2002