Date:         Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:25:10 GMT
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: XPath and Validation
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]> (message from Theo van Veen on Wed, 4
              Feb 2004 13:15:22 +0100)

> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:15:22 +0100
> From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
> Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0
>       tests=BAYES_10
>       version=2.55
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
>
> The xPath  and dc-record issue from a different perspective:
> [blah blah blah]
> Proposal: lets introduce dc_brief and dc_full as predefined record
> schemas implying a servers choice for the record schema that comes
> closest to what is asked. BTW the stylesheet can find out about the
> root tag so we do not need to specify that.

What, _again_?!

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "That was absolutely perfect -- without being actually any
         good" -- producer to the Spice Girls in "Spice World"

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/