Date:         Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:25:52 -0500
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Sorry, got my lists mixed up.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic


> > > I'd prefer implementation rather than server, as we /have/ tried to
avoid
> > > the use of 'server'.
> > We have?  I haven't.  We've avoided *database*.  Recently I've changed
>
> In ZeeRex, I mean, not SRW.
>
> > > Especially with the different usage between SRW and Z39.50.
> > I think both are client/server protocols.
>
> Yes, but for ZeeRex, we need to make the distinction because it describes
> a Z39.50 -database- not a Z39.50 -server-.
>
> Rob
>
> --
>       ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
>     ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
>   ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
> ____/:::::::::::::.
> I L L U M I N A T I