Date:         Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:03:58 -0500
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oldroyd, Bill [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>
> I think this data item should be in every response, not just
> the Explain
> response. The reason being you might only have the response
> available at the
> time you use this information.

Sorry, but I'm not convinced.  Somewhere in the diagnostic path that got a
problem delivered to you will be the URL of the database that generated the
problem.  You can use that to get the Explain record and get the server
information.  This is information only of value to a human doing debugging.
Low frequency stuff with plenty of opportunity for humans to be clever.

Ralph