Date:         Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:17:53 +0000
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic
Comments: To: "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
Comments: cc: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>,
          "Explain (E-mail)" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

> >   <implementation version="1.1">
> >      http://srw.cheshire3.org/
> >   </implementation>

> How about <serverSoftware> instead of <implementation>?  I'd like there to
> be a place for a name.

Make it the same model as Schemas and so forth?

<implementation identifier="foo" version="1.1">
    <title lang="en">Ralph's Badass SRW Server</title>
</implementation>

I'd prefer implementation rather than server, as we /have/ tried to avoid
the use of 'server'. Especially with the different usage between SRW and
Z39.50.

Rob

--
      ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I