Date:Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:29:45 -0500
Reply-To:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:"LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic
Comments:To: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:cc: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>,
"Explain (E-mail)" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:18 AM
>
> <implementation identifier="foo" version="1.1">
> <title lang="en">Ralph's Badass SRW Server</title>
> </implementation>
>
> I'd prefer implementation rather than server, as we /have/
> tried to avoid the use of 'server'. Especially with the
> different usage between SRW and Z39.50.
I don't really care where it goes. Make a spot for it in the Explain record
and I'll use it.
Ralph