Date:         Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:29:45 -0500
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: [Ex-plain] RE: Additional diagnostic
Comments: To: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
Comments: cc: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>,
          "Explain (E-mail)" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:18 AM
>
> <implementation identifier="foo" version="1.1">
>     <title lang="en">Ralph's Badass SRW Server</title>
> </implementation>
>
> I'd prefer implementation rather than server, as we /have/
> tried to avoid the use of 'server'. Especially with the
> different usage between SRW and Z39.50.

I don't really care where it goes.  Make a spot for it in the Explain record
and I'll use it.

Ralph