Date:         Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:30:04 -0000
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "Matthew J. Dovey" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: SOAPAction
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>,
          [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Adam,

Even if it is blank you still need to worry about it when assembling the
SOAP request as blank means it should be

SOAPAction: ""

(not ommitted)

Matthew 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> On Behalf Of Adam Dickmeiss
> Sent: 26 February 2004 19:02
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: SOAPAction
> 
> Matthew J. Dovey wrote:
> 
> >What is the consensus as to whether the SOAPAction is blank 
> or an info 
> >URI representing the operation?
> >
> >Replies by tomorrow and I'll update the WSDL according!
> >
> >Matthew
> >
> >
> >
> Blank is easiest for me. It is ackward to worry about SOAP 
> when assembling a HTTP request.
> 
> -- Adam
>