Date:         Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:02:15 +0100
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: SOAPAction
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

Matthew J. Dovey wrote:

>What is the consensus as to whether the SOAPAction is blank or an info
>URI representing the operation?
>
>Replies by tomorrow and I'll update the WSDL according!
>
>Matthew
>
>
>
Blank is easiest for me. It is ackward to worry about SOAP when
assembling a HTTP request.

-- Adam