Date:         Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:20:13 -0500
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Several things
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 7:11 PM
>
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
> > > From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > >    <recordSchema>dc</recordSchema>
> > > Should instead have the uri.
> > I disagree.  The whole point of the short name for the
> > schema is to enable this.  It is also how Larry does
> > schema references in his examples.
>
> This was in the response right?  If it was the query,
> then yes it's fine.  But recordSchema in the response
> has to be the URI.

Yes. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Ralph