Date:Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:34:21 +0100
Reply-To:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Betr.: Re: Several things
Comments:To: [log in to unmask]Content-Type:text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition:inline
We will echo the record schema exactly as it has been requested. But
there may be a difference between info:srw/schema/1/dc-v1.1 with
maximumRecords=1 and info:srw/schema/1/dc-v1.1 with maximumRcords>1
while both are exactly conform the same schema.
Theo
>>> [log in to unmask] 02/17 1:10 >>>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 6:16 PM
>
> Your example in this is wrong...
> <recordSchema>dc</recordSchema>
> Should instead have the uri.
I disagree. The whole point of the short name for the schema is to
enable
this. It is also how Larry does schema references in his examples.
Ralph