Date:         Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:41:27 -0500
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement)
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

> We only care about attributes on elements in the SRW schema, as RPC
> toolkits can't create them beyond namespaces and types.
>
> In records, it's just more XML. So xml:lang is fine.

No, that wasn't the issue I was raising, it was more philosophical: do we
want "simple" dc or do we want it complicated by additional administrative
metadata?