Date:         Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:20:56 +0000
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: namespaces (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement)
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Comments: cc: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

> > > Does anyone else think that the namespace and the
> > > recordSchema identifier should be the same?
> > * Waving hand wildly * I do, I do!
>
> Sorry but this is a bad idea and I don't see why we're revisiting it.  If
> you use http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1 as the schema identifier, how does
> that identify a schema?

It doesn't which is why we meant to use info:srw/schema/1/dc-v1.1 for the
namespace of the single srw_dc:dc element.

Rob

--
      ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I