Date:         Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:39:29 -0500
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: xScanClause
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 1:19 PM
>
> My server, implemented without reference to the schema (as it didn't
> exist at the time), embeds a searchClause into xScanClause.
> I, personally, find this confusing that xQuery contains a searchClause
> (or triple) but xScanClause contains index and crew, but will fix my
> implementation to the schema.

I think this was intentional.  (At least I'm not surprised by it :-)

We explicitly didn't want the scanClause to be a query, just the term part
of the query.  So, the xScanClause not having a full searchClause in it
seems natural.

Ralph