Date:Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:33:18 -0000
Reply-To:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:"Matthew J. Dovey" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement)
Comments:To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>,
[log in to unmask]Content-Type:text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The diagnostic schema I put up amonsgt all the schemas at
http://samantha.oucs.ox.ac.uk:8080/srw1-1/ does define code as anyURI!
Matthew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Ray Denenberg
> Sent: 13 February 2004 15:28
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement)
>
> > Another issue is the handling of diagnostic codes. I'm
> using numbers
> still,
> > but we've agreed to use URI's.
>
> I just put up a new diagnostic schema Rob just sent me. It
> defines code as anyURI. So I don't think this is an issue any longer.
>
> --Ray
>
>