Date:         Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:33:18 -0000
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "Matthew J. Dovey" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement)
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>,
          [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The diagnostic schema I put up amonsgt all the schemas at
http://samantha.oucs.ox.ac.uk:8080/srw1-1/ does define code as anyURI!

Matthew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> On Behalf Of Ray Denenberg
> Sent: 13 February 2004 15:28
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: diagnostic code (Re: Betr.: Re: draft announcement)
> 
> > Another issue is the handling of diagnostic codes.  I'm 
> using numbers
> still,
> > but we've agreed to use URI's.
> 
> I just put up a new diagnostic schema Rob just sent me. It 
> defines code as anyURI. So I don't think this is an issue any longer.
> 
> --Ray
> 
>