Date:Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:25:25 +0100
Reply-To:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Betr.: Re: draft announcement
Comments:To: [log in to unmask]Content-Type:text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition:inline
Jannifer returned searchRetrieveResponses before. As fa as I know Pica
is not using post.
Post is not part of the SRU standard? Is it?
Theo
>>> [log in to unmask] 13-2-04 13:50:42 >>>
> Hi, Ray. I would be very, very worried if we released now that we'd
> run into exactly the same thing as with 1.0, that none of the
supposed
> reference implementations interoperate due to unreocgnised
> contradictory interpretations of the specification. Our experience
Rob said something like:
I think we do interoperate...
I lie ;) I can get search responses from Adam, and that's it. All
other
requests fail from my SRW client.
But I don't think that's a reason to hold up release. If we had to
wait
for a reference Z39.50 implementation, we'd still be in Version 2 :)
One thing I will bring up:
If you have an SRU server that doesn't do SRW, is there expected
behaviour
for a POST to the URL? Eg Jannifer just returns the SRU (1.0 version)
explain record.
Rob
--
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I