Date:         Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:41:59 GMT
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Betr.: release
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
              ([log in to unmask])

> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:20:23 -0000
> From: "Matthew J. Dovey" <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > Should it continue to link to ez3950?
>
> Yes. I don't think anyone's actually doing full Z39.50 over SOAP
> (outside of small groups of private consenting adults), but this is
> good historical background, so that if someone does asked "can't you
> do Z39.50 over SOAP rather than SRW", we can say - yes and here's
> how...

I guess.  But IMHO, it should be relegated to a footnote at the bottom
of the page, as it's now of only historical interest.  It certainly
shouldn't be listed ahead of ZeeRex, for example!

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "As with most things in life, punctuation doesn't have to
         be perfect, just good enough to get by" -- Terry Cox

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/