Date:         Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:30:06 -0500
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: result set semantics
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 4:10 PM
>
> (2)
> "The 'resultSetTTL' parameter may be supplied to explicitly
> request a time to live for the result set created by the
> query. This is the number of seconds for which the client
> is requesting that the server keep the database around."

Shouldn't the second-to-last word there be "result-set"?  The user usually
has little to say about the persistance of the database.

Ralph