Date:         Fri, 19 Dec 2003 21:03:50 GMT
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: ZeeRex versions
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]> (message from Robert Sanderson on Fri,
              19 Dec 2003 16:52:28 +0000)

> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:52:28 +0000
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
> If we're tying a CQL version to an SRW version, I guess we should
> also tie the ZeeRex version as well?  Or can that be more fluid?

Ooh, tricky.  Especially since one form of the explain request is a
bog-standard HTTP GET that provides no way for the client to say what
its version is.

> If so, SOMEONE needs to comment on my stuff and then put it up on
> explain.z3950.org. :)

Ah, if only I would :-)

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  Join the ASCII ribbon campaign against HTML mail -
         http://arc.pasp.de/

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/