Date:         Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:21:47 -0000
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "Matthew J. Dovey" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

A few observations.

In the scan response example, I think terms and term need to be lower
case (rather than Term).

Also, I think, the diagnostic should be in a 

<srw:diagnostics>
  <diag:diagnostic>

structure rather than a records structure (which only applies to
surrograte diagnostics which aren't applicable in scan)

Matthew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> On Behalf Of Janifer Gatenby
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:21 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1
> 
> I've updated my examples accordingly,
> 
> Janifer
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 19 December 2003 13:44
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: WSDL/Schemas for 1.1
> 
> 
> > Am I looking at the wrong drafts (http://srw.o-r-g.org/new/)
> > I have terms and term where you have scanTerms and Terms in 
> the example!
> 
> I have terms and term in my examples there!
> 
> http://srw.o-r-g.org/new/srw-samples.html
> 
> Rob
> 
> --
>       ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
>     ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
>   ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
> ____/:::::::::::::.
> I L L U M I N A T I
> 
> 
>