Date:         Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:48:57 +0100
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Adam Dickmeiss <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: version element placement.
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed

Robert Sanderson wrote:

>>Wouldn't the schema and protocol spec be shorter if version was outside
>>"operation", i.e.
>>
>>
>
>Yes, but SOAP expects one element to be within <env:Body> (as far as I can
>recall)
>
>
Can't see that requirement in the SOAP spec, but if SOAP (RPC) toolkits
cannot work with it, fine.

>So it would try to find a 'version' operation to handle (if it even got
>that far before complaining)
>
>
If you are using RPC style. But that that's not what the SRW WSDL says.

Anyway, just a thought.

-- Adam

>Rob
>
>--
>      ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
>    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
>  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
>,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
>____/:::::::::::::.
>I L L U M I N A T I
>
>
>