Date:         Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:02:47 +0100
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      TTL Unit (Was: draft result set model)
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
              ([log in to unmask])

> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:05:33 -0400
> From: "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
>
> Did we agree that the unit for TTL's was minutes?  I don't remember.
> Whatever it is, say it explicitly, not simply referred to in the
> example.

Minutes are too coarse.  I can easily imagine a situation in which I
might want to have me SRW client say "keep this around for twenty
seconds" or similar.

Seconds, please.

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor   <[log in to unmask]>   www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "_Apatosaurus_ sort of looks like a pro wrestler when most
         of the other sauropods tend to look like ballerinas" --
         Matt Wedel.