Date:         Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:27:41 -0400
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Ray denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: questions
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]>
> I hate to suggest it, but am going to anyway... what about a diagnostic as
> well as the records? As discussed there are fatal and non fatal
> conditions, and this strikes me as a good non fatal one.
>
> You asked for 100000 records, but I'm not insane, here's 50 and a
> diagnostic to say that 50 is my maximum records retreivable at once.

No problem there. You can always send a non-fatal diagnostic, as many as you
want. (And we don't classify diagnostics as fatal or non-fatal  -- that is,
a given diagnostic may be used in one circumstance  as non-fatal and in
another as fatal).