Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2003)Back to main ZNG pageJoin or leave ZNGReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Wed, 28 May 2003 18:39:24 +0100
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Metaresponse
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]> (message from Theo van Veen on Fri, 23
              May 2003 14:33:27 +0200)

> Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 14:33:27 +0200 > From: Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]> > > - I think the ZNG list should be open for everyone but should still > require people to join via Ray befor sending contributions. I agree. > - I agree with Bill Oldroyd that it should also be possible retrieve > fullr records via a record id, additionallly to to requesting them > via a position in a resultset. The recordid should become part of > the SRU/SRW specifications as request parameter and in the SRU/SRW > response. I agree with Rob that we already have a perfectly good way of expressing this in CQL, and that we ought not to multiple entities unnecessarily. > - With respect to metasearching of several databases on the same > system I think it would be a good step forwards to have a parameter > in which we can specify database names or collection names. When the > database name is returned as a parameter (like recordid) for each > record the receiver can use this for sorting records from different > databases. I don't think we can design this piecemeal, taking one "good step" after another, and realistically hope to arrive at a good design. It'll take someone to come up with, and clearly document, a complete solution. > - There has been a discussion on the Z39.50 list some time ago with > respect to requesting XML records. I mentioned the idea on DCX: > Dublin Core eXtended. You certainly did! :-) I seem to remember that when we last discussed this on the ZIG list, we arrived at rather a good solution. However, I have no memory whatsoever of what it actually was. Anyone remember? > The concept of DCX is explained below and I will submit a proposal > to the DCMI to adopt this concept. It's hard to imagine the DCMI people going for this. > I would like to propose support of DCX (rather than DC) as > compulsary in SRU/SRW. Please give me your opnion on this. I agree with Rob that this would be undesirable. _/|_ _______________________________________________________________ /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk )_v__/\ "Arsene Wenger is trying to influence the panel ... and that's typical of someone driven by self-interest" -- Alex Ferguson. ("Hello kettle, this is Fergie. You're black.") -- Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ZNG page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager