Date:Fri, 23 May 2003 09:04:32 -0400
Reply-To:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:"LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: CQL Range Search Syntax
Comments:To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
So, would it be:
yr within "1980, 1990"
or
yr within "1980 1990"
I'm assuming that the quotes would be mandatory.
What's it going to take to get this approved? Are we comfortable with what
this would look like in classic Z39.50?
Thanks!
Ralph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2003 8:41 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: CQL Range Search Syntax
>
>
> On Fri, 23 May 2003, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
>
> > How do we express a date range search in CQL?
>
> I think that's my proposed 'within' relation for the
> never-really-discussed GEO bits and pieces.
>
> http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0301&L=zng&F=&S=&X=49
> 9A0A17B318735D41&[log in to unmask]&P=3343
>
> R
>
> --
> ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet:
> liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
> ____/:::::::::::::. WWW:
http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I