Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2003)Back to main ZNG pageJoin or leave ZNGReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Thu, 22 May 2003 19:23:32 +0200
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Sebastian Hammer <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: SRW/SRU and Metasearch products
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>,
          [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]
              .ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 17:38 22-05-2003 +0100, Robert Sanderson wrote: > > It was suggested that SRW/SRU had one serious shortcoming where > > metasearching was concerned . . . "while seeking to simplify or > > eliminate some of the complexities of Z39.50, the notion of > > searching multiple databases has been dropped . . . if the > > databases were free this would be true, but the reality is that > > each one has revenue and royalty related business rules associated > > with it and must be distinguished from the query." > >I don't understand the correlation? The way I understood the discussion, the big issue was that many of the content providers host multiple databases, and they have a hard time dealing with large numbers of parallel searches against different databases on their systems, something that frequently results from metasearch engines. They would vastly prefer a model where the metasearch engine (gateway) is able to bundle such requests together so they can optimize it adequately. > > There was also a desire for more result-set and record metadata. > >Were any specifics given? Yes, the big wish was basically for more "branding", primarily in the form of links back to the information provider... they (perhaps justifiably) feel that their own interface is by definition the optimum way of searching their database, and they would like to see metasearch vendors provide links to their native interface for individual records as well as for result sets, to make it easier for users to get to the additional services they might provide... but things like icons for the content vendor, etc. were also mentioned. --Sebastian -- Sebastian Hammer, Index Data <http://www.indexdata.dk/> Ph: +45 3341 0100, Fax: +45 3341 0101


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main ZNG page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager