Date:         Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:40:04 +0200
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Theo van Veen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Betr.: Re: Expansions (was Requesting summary counts)
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline

It should certainly go in TermData.
Theo

>>> [log in to unmask] 12-10-04 11:47:33 >>>
> No there is nothing wrong with that when a user chooses to do so,
but
> in many cases a user is not aware of all  the possibilities without
> making the user interface extremely complicated. An extra field in
> extraRequestData indicating that the result is also a thesaurus term
> would allow the client to offer expansions in a controlled way and
not
> just letting the user try arbitrarily.

Sorry, is this stuff in the extraRequest/ResponseData or stuff in the
extraRecord/TermData?

Are we in the same situation that extraRecord/TermData cannot be
returned unless explicitly indicated by the request?

Matthew