Date:Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:08:36 +0100
Reply-To:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: Expansions (was Requesting summary counts)
Comments:To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:cc: [log in to unmask]In-Reply-To:<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>> making the user interface extremely complicated. An extra field in
>> extraRequestData indicating that the result is also a thesaurus term
>> would allow the client to offer expansions in a controlled way and not
>> just letting the user try arbitrarily.
> Are we in the same situation that extraRecord/TermData cannot be
> returned unless explicitly indicated by the request?
Yes.
Rob
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. University of Liverpool
____/:::::::::::::. L5R Shop: http://www.cardsnotwords.com/
I L L U M I N A T I