Date:         Wed, 19 Jun 2002 13:08:36 -0400
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: diagnostics
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

What's an example of such a diagnostic?

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 1:06 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: diagnostics
>
>
> "LeVan,Ralph" wrote:
>
> > We'll cross the zig non-approval bridge when it catches
> fire.  Until then,
> > assume that they want us to succeed.
>
> It's not a matter of whether they "want us to succeed". It
> doesn't make sense
> to put diagnostics in bib-1 that don't make sense for Z39.50,
> anymore than we
> would put ILL diagnostics in bib-1 (if there were such things).
>
> What we can do is declare a range of diagnostics as private,
> like we've done
> in the bib-1 Use attributes but never so far for diagnostics.
>
> How large a space should we reserve?
>
> --Ray
>