Date:Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:45:18 +0100
Reply-To:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: Betr.: Re: result set model for srw
Comments:To: [log in to unmask]In-Reply-To:<[log in to unmask]> (message from Ray Denenberg on Tue,
18 Jun 2002 15:07:40 -0400)
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:07:40 -0400
> From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
>
> "read it" and "write it" are two different things. It was always a
> premise that humans can read it. That's a premise of XML too, which
> is not intended to be human-writeable.
Hmm. We may be going a bit off-topic here, but I'm not sure I've ever
seen a computer-generated XML document that I could understand without
some degree of pain. In general, the only things that can be read by
humans are things that were written by other humans.
_/|_ _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "Boy meets monolith; boy loses computer; monolith gets boy"
-- Roger Wilmot's plot summary of 2001: A Space Oddysey