Date:         Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:01:43 +0000
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
              (message from Dr Robert Sanderson on Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:00:50
              +0000)

> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:00:50 +0000
> From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > This seems pretty good to me, except that I have some sympathy
> > with Ralph's idea that "allKnown" and "allIndexes" should be
> > switched.
>
> Given that we both had different initial interpretations of the
> name, it implies to me that we need better ones [...]

Yes.

> [...] or to cast it as a relation modifier.
>
> allIndexes =/includeEverythingYouKnow foo

I really, really, really don't think this is a good idea :-)

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  Well?  What _would_ Jesus do?

--
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/