Date:Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:01:43 +0000
Reply-To:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: Betr.: serverChoice interpretations
Comments:To: [log in to unmask]In-Reply-To:<[log in to unmask]>
(message from Dr Robert Sanderson on Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:00:50
+0000)
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:00:50 +0000
> From: Dr Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > This seems pretty good to me, except that I have some sympathy
> > with Ralph's idea that "allKnown" and "allIndexes" should be
> > switched.
>
> Given that we both had different initial interpretations of the
> name, it implies to me that we need better ones [...]
Yes.
> [...] or to cast it as a relation modifier.
>
> allIndexes =/includeEverythingYouKnow foo
I really, really, really don't think this is a good idea :-)
_/|_ _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ Well? What _would_ Jesus do?
--
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio
http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/