Date:         Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:21:29 -0500
Reply-To:     "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set
Comments: To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

From: "Mike Taylor" <[log in to unmask]>
> So -- issues other than that.  Some of the new indexes you introduce
> are arguably applicable to a broader context than GILS: for example,
> "audience" is a useful cross-domain index that should perhaps have
> been included in DC.  Maybe we should have a CQL context set that
> contains such indexes?

I've always advocated this and would like to start one right now.

We have one candidate index: audience. Please suggest others.

And a name for this: That's been the problem before, Utility and Cross
Domain don't work because they each have alternative connotations. How about
"useful"?

--Ray