Date:Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:21:29 -0500
Reply-To:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:"Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
From:"Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: GILS Profile version 3 and GILS context set
Comments:To: "Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: "Mike Taylor" <[log in to unmask]>
> So -- issues other than that. Some of the new indexes you introduce
> are arguably applicable to a broader context than GILS: for example,
> "audience" is a useful cross-domain index that should perhaps have
> been included in DC. Maybe we should have a CQL context set that
> contains such indexes?
I've always advocated this and would like to start one right now.
We have one candidate index: audience. Please suggest others.
And a name for this: That's been the problem before, Utility and Cross
Domain don't work because they each have alternative connotations. How about
"useful"?
--Ray