Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2004)Back to main MODS pageJoin or leave MODSReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:15:05 -0400
Reply-To:     Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Caroline Arms <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: physical vs. digitized item
Comments: To: Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
Comments: cc: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Jenn, Filling in behind Rebecca. The MODS records currently harvestable from LC are all mapped from MARC and the approach taken for one-for-one digital reproductions in LC's catalog (and American Memory) is to describe the original. In many cases, the link provides access to more than one digital manifestation, e.g., images at different resolutions, a book as transcribed text and page images, or a sound recording in different digital formats. We change manifestations available over time without changing the record that provides access -- replacing old scans with better ones, adding a new audio format, and so on. This occurs surprisingly often, and our records get picked up through OCLC and RLG and used in libraries all over the world -- long before OAI. There would be no reasonable way to keep things synchronized. We don't try and use the same records to manage the digital files. We think of it as a record for the intellectual work, with links to digital and physical manifestations. I might ask what the UIUC and Michigan harvesters find works best for them as they build services. Caroline Arms [log in to unmask] Library of Congress On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Riley, Jenn wrote: > Hello all- > > I'm in the final stages of preparing a set of MODS records for a > digitized slide collection > <http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/collections/cushman/> for exposure via the > Open Archives Initiative (OAI), and I need to make a final decision > about how to represent the digitized item (or any of the 4 [sometimes 5] > versions of it!), as opposed to the original analog item. The MODS > records are not being converted from MARC - I'm converting them from a > local metadata format. > > What seems to me to be the right thing to do is to have the MODS record > describe a specific digitized version of the image that the <identifier > type="uri"> in the MODS record points to. I'd then include a > <relatedItem> area with a <physicalDescription> referencing the analog > original. So the relevant parts of a record would look something like > this: > > <!-- DRAFT!!! --> > <physicalDescription> > <internetMediaType>image/jpeg</internetMediaType> > <digitalOrigin>reformatted digital</digitalOrigin> > <note>Original 35mm slide was digitized in 2003 as a TIFF image. > Display versions in JPEG format in three sizes are available.</note> > </physicalDescription> > <identifier > type="uri">http://purl.dlib.indiana.edu/iudl/archives/cushman/P10010</id > entifier> > <relatedItem type="otherFormat"> > <physicalDescription> > <form authority="gmd">graphic</form> > <extent>1 slide : col. ; 35mm</extent> > <note>Original 35mm slide was digitized in 2003 as a TIFF image. > Display versions in JPEG format in three sizes are available.</note> > </physicalDescription> > </relatedItem> > > But most of the MODS records I see out there (mostly LC records exposed > via OAI) don't take this approach. They generally have > <physicalDescription> of the analog item, and contain an <identifier > type="uri"> pointing to an online digitized version. I'm assuming this > is because they're being created from source MARC records originally > created for the analog original, then an 856 field was added when a > digital version was created. But I could be wrong about that. > > So what is everyone else out there doing? If you had infinite time to > tweak mappings to make MODS records look their "best," how would you > represent an original analog vs. a digitized item? > > Thanks! > > Jenn > > ======================== > Jenn Riley > Metadata Librarian > Digital Library Program > Indiana University - Bloomington > Main Library E170 > (812) 856-5759 > www.dlib.indiana.edu >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main MODS page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager