Date:         Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:32:30 -0400
Reply-To:     Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: High Quality XSLT Stylesheets
Comments: To: Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Oct 30, 2004, at 5:21 PM, Michael Wrighton wrote:

> Is bibliox

This is not bibliox.  I've still not settled on what to call it.

> in a state where it can just convert a transform a
> modsCollection into an HTML formatted bibliography?

It depends on what type of citations you use.  Author-year styles are
in good shape (as as well citekey), since this is what I use.

I had footnote/endnote style working, but now have to redo that because
of other changes.  Same with numbered styles common in the hard
sciences.

Both of these last two are difficult in ways different than the
author-year.

Anyway, examples are included, but I've posted them separately as well:

        http://www.users.muohio.edu/darcusb/files/test-author-year.html
        http://www.users.muohio.edu/darcusb/files/test-footnote.html

Both are formatted using the exact same source (docbook + mods)
document; output is configurable with a fairly simple XML file.

Bruce