Date:         Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:46:37 -0500
Reply-To:     Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Bruce D'Arcus <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: mads collection
Comments: To: Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

On Dec 8, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:

> I'll say this though, I  suspect we'll just have to accept that it's
> not going to work the way we'd like and move on.

According to Eric van der Vlist, relying on XMLSpy for creating valid
schemas is not a reliable practice. I suspect part of the problem is
the spec itself, but Oxygen might do a better job because IIRC it's
validator is Xerces.

Of course, the best way to write a clean XML Schema is to author it in
RELAX NG ;-)

Bruce