Date:         Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:09:18 -0400
Reply-To:     Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "Rebecca S. Guenther" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Using MARCXML?
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
Comments: cc: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

See:
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september06/goldsmith/09goldsmith.html

Rebecca
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^  Rebecca S. Guenther                                   ^^
^^  Senior Networking and Standards Specialist            ^^
^^  Network Development and MARC Standards Office         ^^
^^  1st and Independence Ave. SE                          ^^
^^  Library of Congress                                   ^^
^^  Washington, DC 20540-4402                             ^^
^^  (202) 707-5092 (voice)    (202) 707-0115 (FAX)        ^^
^^  [log in to unmask]                                          ^^
^^                                                        ^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Schwartz, Christine wrote:

> [Please forgive the cross posting.]
> 
> Has anyone out there chosen MARCXML for descriptive metadata for their
> digital collections/repositories? We are consider using MARCXML rather
> than DC for textual collections where we need to provide analytical
> access to journal articles, book reviews, etc. We're looking at the pros
> and cons right now for our descriptive metadata. We're already fully
> committed to using METS for our structural metadata.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Chris
> 
>  
> 
> Christine Schwartz
> Head Cataloger
> Princeton Theological Seminary Libraries
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
> 
> Blog: http://www.catalogingfutures.com
> <http://www.catalogingfutures.com/> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>