Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 2003)Back to main MODS pageJoin or leave MODSReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:45:06 -0700
Reply-To:     Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: mods-for-dummies questions
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 06:17 AM 7/16/2003 -0800, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: >2) more a bibliographic question, but when is it appropriate to use the >"manuscript" and "collection" flags? Again, these are very library metadata-centric, so your metadata set may not need them. A manuscript is... well, it's a manuscript, although today's manuscripts are both hand-written, typed (on a typewriter) or printed from a computer. The main thing is that the item is a one-off and hasn't been published. In library catalogs, unpublished dissertations are coded as manuscripts. A collection is something that archivists recognize. All of the boxes of letters by some famous author may be considered a collection. A group of photographs or paintings purchased and "collected" by a person would be considered a collection. Someone's rare books that are donated to a library after their death (or as a tax write-off) would be a collection. It's a collection if it's been collected by someone. You can have a collection of things that are not "archival" in nature, an archive of things that are not a collection, and various combinations in between. This is something I would leave to the archivists who may be the only ones who understand it. >3) a book chapter that is in a book that is part of a series: this is a >record with two nested relatedItem "hosts"? Library records punt when it comes to series. The name of the series is listed in the bibliographic record, and if the series has an ISSN that is also included, but there is not real hierarchical relationship that would give the series as a "host" in the sense that a journal is a host to a journal article or a book is a host to a chapter. Basically, the MARC record and library cataloging rules are fairly flat data representations so there's very little explicit hierarchy. A human user may know enough about series publications to understand that there may also be an entry in the catalog for the whole series or that a search on the series name will bring up all of the individual items in the series that the library has cataloged. It's not very precise, however, since some libraries just catalog the series as an item and others catalog some or all of the individual items. kc


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main MODS page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager