Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2003)Back to main MODS pageJoin or leave MODSReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:04:06 -0400
Reply-To:     Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Suzanne Pilsk <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Dates: Re: [MODS] Additions for citations
Comments: To: [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Apparently, I am always in a bit of a state of confusion, but, I will ask anyway... What if the item is an article that has a specific date that is not the same as the host item? I would want the date, for citation reasons, of the item and the date of the host - Article is dated Feb. 4, 2003 - published in the Journal dated March 2003. I would need the date of the article in the mods record for the article and in the relatedItem field where I point to the host journal the date of the entire journal. Is this what is being discussed in this thread? Suzanne Suzanne C. Pilsk Cataloging Services Smithsonian Institution Libraries PO Box 37012 Natural History Building, Room 30- MRC 0154 Washington, DC 20013-7012 [log in to unmask] 202-357-3161 >>> [log in to unmask] 04/15/03 10:01AM >>> Date could be parsed -- but I'm assuming that date will be placed in the dateType data element so it isn't being carried in the subdocument but the main document. That's one of the areas where I think the MARC record and most citation records differ -- the MARc record has these two levels for a citation (document and host document) and I'm not sure it's clear that's a good idea. It is left over from library practice. The MODS record already is more friendly to citations than the MARC record is in some ways, but it does put a great deal of information under the "host" field and you have to decide what is "host" and what is the item itself. So one question is: if we put the date in the subdocument, does it also need to be in the document? kc At 10:59 AM 4/15/2003 +0200, you wrote: >Karen wrote : > >5) The "text" data element (it might need another name) is a way to >carry > >to unparsed statement from the original metadata record when a > >transformation is done from a citation format to MODS. It may be useful >for > >display even if it is successfully parsed into detailed elements, and >it > >may carry data that doesn't get into the subdocument data elements >(such as > >the date in the middle example). >Why the date element couldn't be also parsed ? > >Yves ********************************************* Karen Coyle [log in to unmask] http://www.kcoyle.net **********************************************


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main MODS page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager