Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.5
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 2002)Back to main MARC pageJoin or leave MARCReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Thu, 30 May 2002 08:33:55 -0400
Reply-To:     [log in to unmask]
Sender:       MARC <[log in to unmask]>
From:         "J. McRee Elrod" <[log in to unmask]>
Organization: Special Libraries Cataloguing, Inc.
Subject:      Re: Non-Filing Indicator Technique
Comments: To: [log in to unmask]
Comments: cc: [log in to unmask]
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>

>Does that mean that use of the technique will not be encouraged, or even >discouraged, for the 245, 110/710 and all those fields that have the nonfiling >indicator? 110/710 have no nonfiling indicators. Those indicator, as in 100/700, are for order of elements in the heading (jurisdiction vs. direct, forename vs. surname), which once upon a time influenced filing. Filing indicators are in title fields such as 130, 245, 440, 730, 740, and 830 (but not 246 and 247). __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([log in to unmask]) {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/ ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main MARC page

LISTSERV.LOC.GOV CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager