Don't you think that DOI is an unique identifier for
any electronic resource. Not even as a location
presentation of DOI, if you click on the DOI number in
any search engine browser like google.com, you will
directly be taken to the respective website of the
resource, which I feel as a part of OpenURL Framework.
What about the InfoURI, where you want to keep it,
will not go in 856?
Rajesh
--- Karen Coyle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it depend on whether the DOI is presented
> as actionable
> (i.e. with
> "http://dx.doi.org/10.1228/0103000001002") or not
> (i.e.
> doi:10.1228/0103000001002 ) ? There's also a
> question of purpose. If the
> purpose in the MARC record is for the user to click
> on it to locate the
> material, then an 856 would be appropriate. If the
> DOI is being used as
> an identifier and you don't intend for the user to
> go directly to the
> site the DOI resolves to, then it would be an 024.
> And I can see no
> reason why you couldn't have both (although it
> shouldn't be considered
> necessary to have both):
>
> 024 $a doi:10.1228/0103000001002 $2: doi
> 856 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1228/0103000001002
>
> kc
>
> On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 23:46, Rajesh Chandrakar
> wrote:
> > Dear Renecca.
> >
> > But, in last discussion some one in the list told
> that
> > the DOI number should be represented with 856
> field
> > with the electronic information?
> >
> > If MARC come out with the separate field like as
> you
> > suggested 024 with $2 for idenfification, would be
> > better. But I would like to know, that in print
> card,
> > in area it should be accomodated, will it be in
> note
> > area as we represent the ISBN number. Whether it
> > should be accomodated with the same line or should
> be
> > in separate line. What could be the excact place
> for
> > it in print card.
> >
> > Rajesh Chandrakar
> > Scientific & Techical Officer
> > Information and Library Network Centre,
> > Ahmedabad, India
> >
> >
> >
> > --- "Rebecca S. Guenther" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > Yes, the 024 is the appropriate place. We are
> adding
> > > a code to be used in
> > > subfield $2 for "doi" to specify the type of
> > > identifier.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > ^^ Rebecca S. Guenther
> > > ^^
> > > ^^ Senior Networking and Standards Specialist
> > > ^^
> > > ^^ Network Development and MARC Standards
> Office
> > > ^^
> > > ^^ 1st and Independence Ave. SE
> > > ^^
> > > ^^ Library of Congress
> > > ^^
> > > ^^ Washington, DC 20540-4402
> > > ^^
> > > ^^ (202) 707-5092 (voice) (202) 707-0115
> (FAX)
> > > ^^
> > > ^^ [log in to unmask]
> > > ^^
> > > ^^
> > > ^^
> > >
> >
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Liisa Sten wrote:
> > >
> > > > Could anybody give an advice where to put DOI
> > > (Digital Object
> > > > Identifier) in MARC21?
> > > > One logical place could be 024, 1st indicator
> 7,
> > > subfield 2?
> > > > Thank you for your help.
> > > >
> > > > Liisa Sten
> > > > System Librarian
> > > > Helsinki University Library
> > > > [log in to unmask]
> > > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool.
> Try it!
> > http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
> --
> -------------------------------------
> Karen Coyle
> Digital Library Specialist
> http://www.kcoyle.net
> Ph: 510-540-7596 Fax: 510-848-3913
> --------------------------------------
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
