|
2005 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report: Section 2—ART
Cycles Using Fresh, Nondonor Eggs or Embryos |
|
This
page contains figures 16–26
Section
2A | Section
2B | Section 2C
How does the risk for miscarriage differ among women of
different ages?
A woman’s age not only affects the chance for pregnancy when her
own eggs are used, but also affects her risk for miscarriage.
Figure 16 shows the percentages
of ART cycles started in 2005 that resulted in miscarriage for women
of different ages. The percentages of ART cycles that resulted in
miscarriage were below 13% among women younger than 33. The
percentages of ART cycles that resulted in miscarriages began to
increase among women in their mid— to late 30s and continued to
increase with age, reaching 27% at age 40 and 64% among women older
than 43.
The risk for miscarriage observed among women undergoing ART
procedures using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos appear to be
similar to those reported in various studies of other pregnant women
in the United States.
Figure 16: Percentages of ART
Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos That Resulted in
Miscarriage, by Age of Woman, 2005.
|
|
What is the risk for pregnancy loss at different
times during pregnancy among women of different ages?
A woman’s risk for pregnancy loss (loss of an entire pregnancy, or all
fetuses in a multiple-fetus pregnancy) is affected by the duration of
her pregnancy and her age. Figure 17
shows that between 13% and 55% of clinically-detected pregnancies
(clinical detection through ultrasound performed between 4 and 6 weeks
after the day of embryo transfer) are lost at some later point during
the pregnancy, depending on the woman’s age. Among women younger than
35, 13% of pregnancies were lost and 87% continued through week 24. In
contrast, among women older than 42, 55% of pregnancies were lost and
only 45% continued through week 24. In all age groups, most pregnancy
losses occurred before week 14 (i.e., during the first trimester). The
risk of pregnancy loss after 24 weeks was less than 1% for all age
groups because most pregnancies that progress beyond week 24 lead to
live births.
Figure 17:
Percentages of Pregnancies That Continued Past a Given Gestational Week
Among Women Who Had ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by
Age of Woman, 2005. |
|
How does a woman's age affect her chances of progressing
through the various stages of ART?
In 2005, a total of 97,442 cycles using fresh nondonor
eggs or embryos were started:
-
41,302 in women younger than 35
-
22,624 in women 35—37
-
19,482 in women 38—40
-
8,997 in women 41—42
-
5,037 in women older than 42
Figure 18 shows that a womans chance of progressing from
the beginning of ART to pregnancy and live birth (using her own eggs)
decreases at every stage of ART as her age increases.
-
As women get older, the likelihood of a successful response to ovarian
stimulation and progression to egg retrieval decreases.
-
As women get older, cycles that have progressed to
egg retrieval are slightly less likely to reach transfer.
-
The percentage of cycles that progress from transfer to
pregnancy also
decreases as women get older.
-
As women get older, cycles that have progressed to pregnancy are less
likely to result in a live birth because the risk for miscarriage is
greater (see Figure 16).
Overall, 37% of cycles started in 2005 among women younger than 35
resulted in live births. This percentage decreased to 29% among women
35–37 years of age, 20% among women 38—40, 11% among women 41—42, and 4%
among women older than 42. As noted in Figures 14 and
15, the proportion of cycles that resulted in singleton live births
is even lower for each age group.
Figure 18:
Outcomes of ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by Stage
and Age Group, 2005. |
|
What are the causes of infertility among couples who use
ART?
Figure 19 shows the infertility
diagnoses reported among couples who had an ART procedure using fresh
nondonor eggs or embryos in 2005. Diagnoses range from one infertility
factor in one partner to multiple factors in either one or both
partners. However, diagnostic procedures may vary from one clinic to
another, so the categorization may also vary.
-
Tubal factor means that the woman’s fallopian tubes
are blocked or damaged, making it difficult for the egg to be
fertilized or for an embryo to travel to the uterus.
-
Ovulatory dysfunction means that the ovaries are not
producing eggs normally. Such dysfunctions include polycystic ovary
syndrome and multiple ovarian cysts.
-
Diminished ovarian reserve means that the ability of
the ovary to produce eggs is reduced. Reasons include congenital, medical, or surgical
causes or advanced age.
-
Endometriosis involves the presence of tissue
similar to the uterine lining in abnormal locations. This condition
can affect both fertilization of the egg and embryo implantation.
-
Uterine factor means a structural or functional
disorder of the uterus that results in reduced fertility.
-
Male factor refers to a low sperm count or problems
with sperm function that make it difficult for a sperm to fertilize
an egg under normal conditions.
-
Other causes of infertility include immunological
problems, chromosomal abnormalities, cancer chemotherapy, and
serious illnesses.
-
Unexplained cause means that no cause of infertility
was found in either the woman or the man.
-
Multiple factors, female only, means that more than
one female cause was diagnosed.
-
Multiple factors, female and male, means that one or
more female causes and male factor infertility were diagnosed.
Figure 19:
Diagnoses Among Couples Who Had ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or
Embryos, 2005. |
|
Does the cause of infertility affect the chances of
success using ART?
Figure 20 shows the
percentage of ART cycles that resulted in live births according to the
causes of infertility. (See Figure 19,
or the Glossary in Appendix B for an explanation of the diagnoses.)
Although the national average success rate was about 28% (see
Figure 7) success rates varied
somewhat depending on the couple’s diagnosis; however, the definitions
of these diagnoses may vary from clinic to clinic. In general, couples
diagnosed with tubal factor, ovulatory dysfunction, endometriosis, male
factor, or unexplained infertility had success rates above the national average. The lowest success rate was observed for those with diminished
ovarian reserve. Additionally, couples with uterine factor, “other”
causes, or multiple infertility factors had below‑average success
rates. Please note, however, that a review of select clinical records revealed that reporting of infertility causes may be incomplete.
Therefore, differences in success rates by causes of infertility should
be interpreted with caution. (See
Findings from Validation Visits for 2005 ART Data in Appendix A for
additional information.)
Figure 20:
Percentages of ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos That
Resulted in Live Births, by Diagnosis, 2005.
|
|
How many women who use ART have
previously given birth?
Figure 21 shows the
number of previous births among women who had an ART procedure using
fresh nondonor eggs or embryos in 2005. Most of these women (about 72%)
had no previous births, although they may have had a pregnancy that
resulted in a miscarriage or an induced abortion. About 21% of women
using ART in 2005 reported one previous birth, and about 8% reported two
or more previous births. However, we do not have information about how
many of these were ART births and how many were not. These data
nonetheless point out that women who have previously had children can
still face infertility problems.
Figure 21: Number
of Previous Births Among Women Who Had ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor
Eggs or Embryos, 2005. |
|
Do women who have previously given
birth have higher ART success rates?
Figure 22 shows the relationship
between the success of an ART cycle and the woman’s history of previous
births. Previous live-born infants were conceived naturally in some
cases and through ART in others. In all age groups, women who had a
previous live birth were more likely to have a successful ART
procedure.
Figure 22:
Percentages of ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos That
Resulted in Live Births, by Woman’s Age and Number of Previous Live
Births, 2005. |
|
Is there a difference in ART success
rates between women with previous miscarriages and women who have never
been pregnant?
In 2005, 70,068 ART cycles were performed among women who
had not previously given birth. However, about 27% of those cycles were
reported by women with one or more previous pregnancies that had ended
in miscarriage—we do not have information on whether these pregnancies
ending in miscarriage were the result of ART or were conceived
naturally. Figure 23 shows the
relationship between the success of an ART cycle and the history of
previous miscarriage. In all age groups, women who had a previous
miscarriage were as likely to have a live birth as women who had never
been pregnant. Thus, a history of unsuccessful pregnancy does not appear
to be associated with lower chances for success during ART.
Figure 23:
Percentages of ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos That
Resulted in Live Births, by Woman’s Age and History of Miscarriage,
Among Women with No Previous Births, 2005.
|
|
How many current ART users have
undergone previous ART cycles?
Figure 24 presents
ART cycles that used fresh nondonor eggs or embryos in 2005 according to
whether previous ART cycles had been performed. For about 43%, one or
more previous cycles were reported. (This percentage includes previous
cycles using either fresh or frozen embryos.) This finding illustrates
that it is not uncommon for a couple to undergo multiple ART cycles. We
do not have information on when previous cycles were performed, nor do
we have information on the outcomes of those previous cycles.
Figure 24: Number of
Previous ART Cycles Among Women Undergoing ART in 2005 with Fresh
Nondonor Eggs or Embryos.
|
|
Are success rates different for women
using ART for the first time and women who previously used ART but did
not give birth?
Figure 25 shows the
relationship between the success of ART cycles performed in 2005 using
fresh nondonor eggs or embryos and a history of previous ART cycles
among women with no previous births. In all age groups up to age 42,
success rates were lower for women who had previously undergone an
unsuccessful ART cycle.
Figure 25: Percentages of ART Cycles
Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos That Resulted in Live Births, by
Woman’s Age and History of Previous ART Cycles, Among Women with No
Previous Births, 2005.
|
|
What are the success rates for women who have had both previous
ART and previous births?
Figure 26 shows the relationship
between the success of ART cycles performed in 2005 using fresh nondonor
eggs or embryos and a history of both previous ART cycles and previous
births. We do not have information on whether the previous births were
the result of ART or were conceived naturally. However, among women with
previous births, success rates among women who did not undergo a
previous ART procedure were comparable to success rates among women who
had undergone previous ART cycles.
Taken together, Figures 25 and
26 show that having undergone
previous ART cycles may be related to the success of the current ART
cycle. However, it is important to consider the outcomes of previous
cycles and whether the woman has given birth in the past.
Figure 26: Percentages of ART Cycles
Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos That Resulted in Live Births, by
Woman’s Age and History of Previous ART Cycles, Among Women with One or
More Previous Births, 2005.
|
|
Section
1 | Section 2 |
Section
3 | Section 4 |
Section
5
Previous ART Reports
Implementation of the Fertility
Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992
Assisted Reproductive Technology: Embryo
Laboratory
Page last reviewed: 12/12/07
Page last modified: 12/12/07
Content source: Division
of Reproductive Health,
National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion
|
|
|