I am
pleased to introduce the Intellectual Property Enforcement Act of 2007.
Congress is charged “to promote the progress of science and useful
arts,” and part of promotion is protection. This legislation will
enhance existing intellectual property enforcement laws, provide more
resources to combat infringement, and harmonize copyright and trademark
laws. I thank Senator Cornyn for joining me in this effort, which is a
high priority of mine, and also of the creative communities and
industries across the county.
Each
year, counterfeiting and copyright infringement cost the U.S. economy
billions of dollars. The International Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition
estimates that counterfeiting and piracy cost American businesses $250
billion a year – and hundreds of thousands of jobs as well. Clearly, IP
theft is big business, and that can devastate small businesses. No one
knows this better than Vermont companies such as Hubbardton Forge,
Vermont Teddy Bear Company, and Burton Snowboards. Each of these
companies, and many others like them across the nation. invests time,
money, and effort in the development of new products. When their
products are infringed, it devalues the product and threatens the
company.
Senator Cornyn and I have heard from a myriad of interested parties
about the importance of protecting intellectual property, and have seen
many enforcement proposals. The legislation we introduce today will
serve as the core of our legislative effort this year. It will start
the process of considering how to ensure that our enforcement laws are
up to the task, and that the necessary resources are in place to enforce
them. Other Senators have introduced legislation to address these
issues, and the Department of Justice and others have suggested
legislative language. These are all helpful to the debate, and I expect
there will be more to come. Introduction of the Intellectual Property
Enforcement Act of 2007 is the beginning of this important effort.
The
centerpiece of the bill we introduce today gives the Department of
Justice the ability to bring civil actions against copyright
infringers. Punishment should fit the crime, and a civil action is
often more appropriate to the wrong being done in such cases than is
criminal prosecution. This concept has passed the Senate on three
separate occasions, as the PIRATE Act. Next, this bill adds resources
for agents to combat infringement. It does not matter how strong our
laws are, if there are not enough agents, or if our agents do not have
the proper expertise to investigate and prosecute crimes, piracy will
flourish and harm our economy. Third, this bill allows for “harmless
errors” on copyright registration forms. Copyright registration should
not be voided by innocently checking the wrong box or misspelling a word
on a form. Finally, this bill harmonizes the forfeiture provisions in
the copyright and trademark statutes.
By
enacting well-balanced enforcement laws, we can protect both the
creators and the consumers of intellectual property. It is impossible
to put a price tag on creativity, but we must do all we can to protect
the fruits of creative labor.
I ask unanimous consent that the
full bill text be included in the Record.